Supremacy, Status or Style


The Geneva motor show is most important European show. If you have a role of any kind in the car industry, this is where you should be. And this is where everybody is. From Marchione to Ghosn, van Acker to Donckerwolke, Shakira to Usher, Elkann to Muller, or from Jackie Stewart to Niki Lauda.

The first two days of the show have a different signature. Day 1, Tuesday, is dedicated to the press. Cameras everywhere, accompanied with celebs and industry moguls.  For me, this is when I pick up the news and enjoy the fact that I can go anywhere I want. Always welcomed with a smile.  Great coffee at Alfa Romeo.

The next day, still closed to the general public, is dedicated to the industry and important clients. This is when local dealers show up. When rich clients park their gulfstreams and offload their armcandy to see whether there are still some roubles to burn on supercars.  I love to observe how givers, takers and fakers interact.


Over the years I have seen this group change. New cultures entered.  New money looking for new means to communicate supremacy, status or style. This money is attracted by the heritage, design and fine technology of European automotive. Or the other way around: The uniqueness of European cars is the combination of heritage, design and quality. 

 And this is why I don’t understand Lamborghini’s choices.


Last month Lamborghini introduced the Veneno. This monster from Sant'Agata Bolognese is based of the Aventador LP700-4 body but with more extreme body styling made entirely of carbon fiber. An Aventador dressed up for the Brazilian carnival in Rio with a retail price tag of a whopping € 3.5 million.

There will be four copies including the test model Lamborghini plans to keep. The other three are already sold out even before going into production. A rapper named Birdman with a tattooed face including a huge red star on the top of his head has already made a down-payment of $1 million to become one of the three exclusive owners.


From a commercial perspective I understand the exercise.  This trick works: The Lamborghini Murciélago LP640 based Reventon sold out within months.

Though from a strategic perspective I do not understand how to strengthen your brand with an over-priced, heavily dressed up car. And I doubt if publically selling it to someone like mister Birdman helps emphasising Lamborghinis brand values. I’m sure if I had the money, I’d rather identify myself with Jay Kay, Fernando Alonso or even Rowan Atkinson.

What would be another option? Lets take a look at the other Italian supercar: Ferrari. They introduced LaFerrari: An aerodynamically lined supercar, packed with high tech stuff unavailable anywhere else. Science on wheels,  not a pimped F12berlinetta. And all for only 1 million euros. LaFerrari’s specs and stats will be hard to beat by the powerplayers of the hypercar world.

Or look at the 918 spyder hybrid. Again, an extremely innovative car based on Porsches heritage. They reinvented the supercar for the 21st century 

Does it lack clientele? Not at all. Does it lack clientele in upcoming countries? No! Did they need a 911-turbo based über-styled pussywagon?

Secretly I like the evil niece better.  She’s raw, she is born from frustration. A wild bull, Not a well trained horse. And even better: She created the Miura, my eternal love.

I’m 100% sure new money will be persuaded by Lambo's real DNA. I’m sure that sticking to its core values will lead to a sustainable image. Eventually, hopefully, leading to the new Miura.

5 thoughts on “Supremacy, Status or Style

  1. Matt

    Interesting thoughts and a look into the Geneva show scene. My old design professor would have said that this Bull is “purely a styling exercise”……content, very little, packaging, a lot of shiny wrapped gift paper. Cudos for Ferrari!

  2. Rik

    Aren’t styling exercises meant as a means of communication, to help strengthen the brand?
    If so, than I can also not understand this car.
    On the other hand we had a similar thing happening last year with the Bentley SUV. At the time it seemed a total failure…..after some time I’m not so sure.
    Again: These objects are no longer meant for us. The new markets don’t seem so negative.
    Maybe Lamborghini and Bentley (VAG) have got it right, spot on!

  3. Geert

    Maybe VAG (read: Mr. Piëch) was simply frustrated that after the Glickenhaus and Clapton one-offs, based on prancing horses, nobody bothered to do the same exclusive coachbuilding trick using a raging bull.
    Also, with both Porsche and Lambo in their portfolio, VAG have the luxury of running both strategies side-by-side.
    The Miura is the love of my life also, and exactly for that reason (contrary to Mr. de’Silva) I would not want to see it reinvented.
    Kudos to Jay Kay.

  4. huib

    Interesting thoughts. New business status seems to have a strong tie purely to the brand name only now, no matter too much what their heritage and design was, is or will be, just as long as the badge is prominently on the car?

  5. Steve

    Nice piece! The Audi/VW design teams were also unanimous with their opinions about the Lambo ‘ What the F**k?’
    Inside knowledge tells us that De Silva did not approve it
    and that it was pushed through by Mr Winkelman, the high collared chairman of Lamborghini.
    I like a quote from the British press as Winkelman stepped out of the car at it’s premiere, the evening before the show ‘Can Mr Winkelman’s shoes get any pointier, can Lamborghini’s get any sharper?’
    By the way It’s Jackie Stewart!


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>